4.5 Article

Definition, management, and training in impacted fetal head at cesarean birth: a national survey of maternity professionals

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages 1219-1226

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14600

Keywords

brain injury; cesarean birth; disimpaction; fetal pillow & REG;; impacted fetal head; maternity; online; survey; training; vaginal push-up

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the views, understanding, and current practices of maternity professionals regarding impacted fetal head at cesarean birth, in order to provide guidance on standardized definition, clinical management approaches, and training. The findings showed a high level of agreement on the definition of impacted fetal head and the need for a multi-professional team approach to management. There was also a significant demand for training in the management of impacted fetal head.
Introduction: This study assessed views, understanding and current practices of maternity professionals in relation to impacted fetal head at cesarean birth, with the aim of informing a standardized definition, clinical management approaches and training.Material and methods: We conducted a survey consultation including the range of maternity professionals who attend emergency cesarean births in the UK. Thiscovery, an online research and development platform, was used to ask closed-ended and free-text questions. Simple descriptive analysis was undertaken for closed-ended responses, and content analysis for categorization and counting of free-text responses. Main outcome measures included the count and percentage of participants selecting predefined options on clinical definition, multi-professional team approach, communication, clinical management and training.Results: In total, 419 professionals took part, including 144 midwives, 216 obstetricians and 59 other clinicians (eg anesthetists). We found high levels of agreement on the components of an impacted fetal head definition (79% of obstetricians) and the need for use of a multi-professional approach to management (95% of all participants). Over 70% of obstetricians deemed nine techniques acceptable for management of impacted fetal head, but some obstetricians also considered potentially unsafe practices appropriate. Access to professional training in management of impacted fetal head was highly variable, with over 80% of midwives reporting no training in vaginal disimpaction.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate agreement on the components of a standardized definition for impacted fetal head, and a need and appetite for multi-professional training. These findings can inform a program of work to improve care, including use of structured management algorithms and simulation-based multi-professional training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available