4.5 Article

Exploring the successful experience of time-restricted eating in overweight adults: A qualitative study

Journal

APPETITE
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106979

Keywords

Time -restricted eating; Overweight adults; Obesity; Weight loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to examine the experiences of overweight adults who have implemented time-restricted eating (TRE) for weight loss, in order to identify strategies for long-term weight maintenance. The findings highlight the importance of viewing TRE as a lifestyle, developing specific action plans to overcome obstacles, and maintaining a positive attitude and self-belief as sources of support.
Time-restricted eating (TRE) has gained popularity in recent years as a weight loss option. Although many studies have explored the effectiveness of fasting, few have investigated the successful implementation of this method. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the successful and failed experiences of overweight adults who have implemented TRE for weight loss, in order to identify strategies for maintaining a favorable weight over time. The study utilized semi-structured interviews and followed Constructivist Grounded Theory to collect and analyze data. Data saturation was achieved through purposive and theoretical sampling of 30 overweight adults. The research confirms four stages in the process of weight loss using a TRE strategy, namely, preparation, adaptation, challenge, and maintenance. The findings revealed that the successful implementation of TRE and its maintenance over time require viewing TRE as a lifestyle rather than a tool for short-term weight loss, the development of specific action plans to overcome obstacles, and a positive attitude and self-belief as important sources of support. Based on the study's results, a guide has been provided for those who wish to use TRE as a dietary control method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available