4.6 Article

A water vapour fuelled Hall Effect Thruster: Characterization and comparison with oxygen

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages 702-715

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.046

Keywords

Hall Effect Thrusters; Electric propulsion; Water vapour; Water electrolysis; Water condensation; Water feed system; Reactive model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An investigation was carried out on a Hall Effect Thruster propelled by water vapour at the Imperial Plasma Propulsion Laboratory. A water vapour feed system was designed and optimized to maintain the water in vapour state. The efficiency of the thruster was measured using a hanging pendulum thrust balance, and a comparison was made between water vapour and oxygen as propellants.
A Hall Effect Thruster propelled by water vapour is investigated at the Imperial Plasma Propulsion Laboratory. For that purpose, a water vapour feed system is designed, optimized and tested, with the major objective of keeping water in vapour state at all times. This system primarily consists of a mass flow controller, a flow restrictor, and a heating and pressure monitor system capable of identifying under which conditions water condensation occurs. A hanging pendulum thrust balance is used to measure the thrust on the power range of Pd = 600-1600 W. Different magnetic field strengths and mass flows are investigated to determine the conditions in which the highest efficiency can be achieved. Then, a comparison between water vapour and oxygen (intended to be the propellant of a water electrolysis Hall Effect Thruster) is included. The results show that oxygen is approximately 20% more efficient than water vapour under the same operating conditions. Overall, the highest thrust measurement recorded with water vapour was 20.0 & PLUSMN; 0.2 mN; with a specific impulse of 2039 & PLUSMN; 20 s and an anode efficiency of 12.5 & PLUSMN; 0.3% at the largest discharge power of investigation (Pd = 1600 & PLUSMN; 1 W).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available