4.6 Review

Lung volume, capacity and shape in microgravity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 424-435

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.08.005

Keywords

Pulmonary anatomy; Microgravity; Spaceflight; Parabolic flight; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examines the effects of microgravity on lung function in humans. The results indicate that there is no significant change in lung volume and capacity during long-duration spaceflight, and only slight or no changes during parabolic and short-duration spaceflight. Additionally, no consistent effects on lung shape in microgravity compared to normal Earth gravity were observed.
The advent of consumer spaceflight raises the issue of individuals with health conditions being exposed to periods of microgravity. Terrestrial lung function is gravitationally dependent, so it is important to understand the key lung functional changes currently understood to occur with a change in gravitational load. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the effects of a microgravity (0G) environment on various volume, capacity and shape measurements on the human lung relative to normal Earth gravity (1G). Thirty studies including parabolic flights (10-25 s), short-duration spaceflight (=30 days) and long-duration spaceflight (>30 days) were analysed. Parameters including lung shape, volumes and capacities reported in 1G (before flight) and 0G (inflight) were extracted from these sources. While no change was seen in lung volume and capacity measurements between 0G and 1G in long-duration spaceflight, there were slight or no changes in parabolic and short-duration spaceflight. Additionally, no consistent effects were observed in lung shape in microgravity compared to 1G.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available