4.8 Article

Symmetry-Breaking p-Block Antimony Single Atoms Trigger N-Bridged Titanium Sites for Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction with High Efficiency

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 17, Issue 21, Pages 21838-21849

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c07857

Keywords

asymmetrically coordinated catalyst; antimonysingleatom; Sb-N1C2 moiety; Ti3C2T x MXene; nitrogen reduction reaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an asymmetrically coordinated p-block antimony single-atom catalyst immobilized on nitrogen-doped Ti3C2Tx was designed for electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (eNRR). The catalyst exhibited ultrahigh ammonia yield and excellent Faradaic efficiency under mild conditions, and the mechanism of catalysis was explained through experimental and theoretical calculations.
The electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (eNRR) under mild conditions emerges as a promising approach to produce ammonia (NH3) compared to the typical Haber-Bosch process. Herein, we design an asymmetrically coordinated p-block antimony single-atom catalyst immobilized on nitrogen-doped Ti3C2Tx (Sb SA/N-Ti3C2Tx) for eNRR, which exhibits ultrahigh NH3 yield (108.3 mu g h(-1) mg(cat)(-1)) and excellent Faradaic efficiency (41.2%) at -0.3 V vs RHE. Complementary in situ spectroscopies with theoretical calculations reveal that the nitrogen-bridged two titanium atoms triggered by an adjacent asymmetrical Sb-N1C2 moiety act as the active sites for facilitating the protonation of the rate-determining step from *N-2 to *N2H and the kinetic conversion of key intermediates during eNRR. Moreover, the introduction of Sb-N1C2 promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies to expose more titanium sites. This work presents a strategy for single-atom-decorated ultrathin two-dimensional materials with the aim of simultaneously enhancing NH3 yield and Faradaic efficiency for electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available