4.4 Article

Searching the half-full glass of COVID-19 pandemic: basic hygienic measures positively impact on postoperative infections after major elective urological surgery: a single-center matched pair analysis

Journal

MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 366-373

Publisher

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.05011-X

Keywords

COVID-19; Hygiene; Urologic surgical procedures; male; Infections; Postoperative complications; Length of stay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of COVID-19-related hygiene measures on hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) after major urological surgery. The results showed significant reduction in HAIs rate and postoperative complications, as well as shorter hospital stay after the introduction of COVID-19-related hygiene measures. Therefore, prolonged application of these measures could have lasting benefits.
BACKGROUND: Since before the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) represented a global healthcare crisis. Few studies suggested that COVID-19-related basic hygiene measures (BHM) could lower HAIs rates, reaching inconclusive results. The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothetical benefit on HAIs rate of COVID-19-enhanced BHM systematic introduction after major elective urological surgery.METHODS: Since the pandemic began, our hospital has implemented BHM to limit the spread of COVID-19. We com-pared patients operated in the pre-COVID-19 era (no-BHM period) with those operated after the pandemic started (BHM period). Outcomes were the incidence of HAIs and postoperative complications, and the length of hospital stay (LOS). Two balanced groups were generated by propensity score 1:1 matching.RESULTS: Of 1053 major urological interventions, 604 were performed in the no-BHM period, and 449 in the BHM period. After matched analysis, the comparison groups consisted of 310 patients each. Of 107 recorded HAIs, 43 occurred during the BHM period (13.9%), and 64 during the no-BHM period (20.7%), with a statistically significant difference in multivariable analysis (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.3-0.8], P=0.004). Postoperative complications rate was significantly lower in the BHM period than in the no-BHM period (29.0% versus 36.5%, OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.4-0.9], P=0.01). The LOS dif-fered significantly between BHM and no-BHM periods: a median of 5 (5-8) days versus 6 (5-8), respectively (P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The risk of infections, postoperative complications, and prolonged LOS after major urological surgery was significantly reduced with the systematic introduction of COVID-19-related BHM, their application could, therefore, be prolonged with lasting benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available