4.8 Article

Extreme rainfall reduces one-twelfth of China's rice yield over the last two decades

Journal

NATURE FOOD
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 416-426

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00753-6

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extreme rainfall has a significant impact on rice yield in China, resulting in reductions comparable to those caused by extreme heat. The main mechanisms of these impacts are the limitation of nitrogen availability for tillering and the physical disturbance on pollination. Projection suggests an additional 8% yield reduction due to extreme rainfall under warmer climate by the end of the century. These findings emphasize the importance of considering extreme rainfall in food security assessments.
Extreme climate events constitute a major risk to global food production. Among these, extreme rainfall is often dismissed from historical analyses and future projections, the impacts and mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Here we used long-term nationwide observations and multi-level rainfall manipulative experiments to explore the magnitude and mechanisms of extreme rainfall impacts on rice yield in China. We find that rice yield reductions due to extreme rainfall were comparable to those induced by extreme heat over the last two decades, reaching 7.6 +/- 0.9% (one standard error) according to nationwide observations and 8.1 +/- 1.1% according to the crop model incorporating the mechanisms revealed from manipulative experiments. Extreme rainfall reduces rice yield mainly by limiting nitrogen availability for tillering that lowers per-area effective panicles and by exerting physical disturbance on pollination that declines per-panicle filled grains. Considering these mechanisms, we projected similar to 8% additional yield reduction due to extreme rainfall under warmer climate by the end of the century. These findings demonstrate that it is critical to account for extreme rainfall in food security assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available