4.7 Article

Comparative measurement of the breakup length of liquid jets in airblast atomisers using optical connectivity, electrical connectivity and shadowgraphy

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 288-299

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.062

Keywords

Liquid atomisation; Optical connectivity; Electrical connectivity; Shadowgraphy; Liquid breakup length

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/G01597X/1]
  2. European Office of Aerospace Research and Development (EOARD) [FA8655-09-1-3036]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G01597X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/G01597X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative examination of the optical connectivity, electrical connectivity and shadowgraphy techniques for the measurement of the break-up length of atomising liquid jets from a co-axial airblast atomiser is presented. The atomiser was operated over air-to-liquid Momentum Ratios between 27 and 335 and Momentum Flux Ratios between 0.67 and 8.27. Shadowgraphy records instantaneous images of the shadow of the atomising liquid jet when it is back-illuminated by a light source. The electrical connectivity uses the continuity of an electrically conducting atomising liquid jet to measure the potential during the presence of an electrical connection between the spray nozzle and a probe further downstream. The optical connectivity visualises the atomising liquid jet, doped with a fluorescing dye, as it is illuminated from within the nozzle using a laser beam. Comparison of the measured breakup lengths with time resolved shadowgraphy, optical connectivity and electrical connectivity, following the proposed novel processing of the time-dependent potential, showed that the mean values are all within +/-15% of each other. The advantages and limitations of each technique are discussed. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available