3.9 Article

A Workflow for Uncertainty Assessment in Elemental Analysis of Archaeological Ceramics: A Case Study of Neolithic Coarse Pottery from Eastern Siberia

Journal

HERITAGE
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 4434-4450

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/heritage6050234

Keywords

archaeological ceramics; elemental analysis; WDXRF; ICP-MS; SEM; mu XRF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the assessment of uncertainties introduced during the elemental analysis of archaeology ceramics, using Neolithic pottery sherds from Popovsky Lug as an example. Through cutting original sherds into subsamples and analyzing them using X-ray fluorescence and mass spectrometry methods, the variations between subsamples were compared with the variations introduced during the analytical process. The results showed that 250-350 mg of ceramics is sufficient for good reproducibility in the analysis of major and trace elements.
In this study, the assessment of uncertainties introduced at different stages of the elemental analysis of archaeological ceramics has been described using the example of the Neolithic pottery sherds from Popovsky Lug (eastern Siberia). To evaluate the uncertainty introduced by sampling due to ceramic heterogeneity, three original sherds were cut into small subsamples. Powdered subsamples (250-350 mg) were analyzed using wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry methods, and the variations between analytical results for independent subsamples were compared with the variations introduced during the analytical process (measurement and sample preparation). It was shown that 250-350 mg of ceramic is sufficient to obtain good reproducibility (2-15%) between separate subsamples for most major and trace elements, even for the heterogeneous Neolithic ceramics included in this study. The differing behavior of concentration variations in some elements was explained by measuring the ceramic cross-sections by scanning electron microscopy and micro-X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, as well as by the theoretic modeling of the sampling error. The described workflow can be useful in finding uncertainties in elemental analysis results, which may affect the interpretation of bulk chemical composition in ceramic provenance studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available