3.8 Article

Regional and national antimicrobial stewardship activities: a survey from the Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance-Primary Care Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Network (JPIAMR-PAAN)

Journal

JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad048

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study surveyed the activities and policies of the Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance - Primary care Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Network (JPIAMR-PAAN) member countries in antibiotic stewardship efforts. The survey revealed gaps and variations in activities and funding sources. However, most countries have national antibiotic stewardship programs or policies aimed at supporting ongoing antimicrobial stewardship efforts and sustainability. The study concludes that JPIAMR-PAAN will continue to collaborate among its members to create best practice resources and toolkits for antibiotic audit and feedback interventions in primary care settings and identify research priorities.
Background Antibiotic overuse and misuse in primary care are common, highlighting the importance of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) efforts in this setting. Audit and feedback (A&F) interventions can improve professional practice and performance in some settings. Objectives and methods To leverage the expertise from international members of the Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance - Primary care Antibiotic Audit and feedback Network (JPIAMR-PAAN). Network members all have experience of designing and delivering A&F interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in primary care settings. We aim to introduce the network and explore ongoing A&F activities in member regions. An online survey was administered to all network members to collect regional information. Results Fifteen respondents from 11 countries provided information on A&F activities in their country, and national/regional antibiotic stewardship programmes or policies. Most countries use electronic medical records as the primary data source, antibiotic appropriateness as the main outcome of feedback, and target GPs as the prescribers of interest. Funding sources varied across countries, which could influence the frequency and quality of A&F interventions. Nine out of 11 countries reported having a national antibiotic stewardship programme or policy, which aim to provide systematic support to ongoing AMS efforts and aid sustainability. Conclusions The survey identified gaps and opportunities for AMS efforts that include A&F across member countries in Europe, Canada and Australia. JPIAMR-PAAN will continue to leverage its members to produce best practice resources and toolkits for antibiotic A&F interventions in primary care settings and identify research priorities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available