4.2 Article

Design and synthesis of axially chiral aryl-pyrroloindoles via the strategy of organocatalytic asymmetric (2

Journal

FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 237-248

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.01.002

Keywords

Asymmetric organocatalysis; Axial chirality; Indole; Atroposelectivity; Enantioselectivity; Cyclization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new strategy for designing and synthesizing axially chiral indole-based frameworks was developed. Aryl-pyrroloindoles were synthesized via organocatalytic asymmetric cyclization between 3-arylindoles and propargylic alcohols. These frameworks were also transformed into efficient chiral ligands for palladium-catalyzed asymmetric reactions. The reaction mechanism was investigated using theoretical calculations.
The catalytic asymmetric construction of axially chiral indole-based frameworks is an important area of research due to the unique characteristics of such frameworks. Nevertheless, research in this area is still in its infancy and has some challenges, such as designing and constructing new classes of axially chiral indole-based scaffolds and developing their applications in chiral catalysts, ligands, etc. To overcome these challenges, we present herein the design and atroposelective synthesis of aryl-pyrroloindoles as a new class of axially chiral indole-based scaffolds via the strategy of organocatalytic asymmetric (2 + 3) cyclization between 3-arylindoles and propargylic alcohols. More importantly, this new class of axially chiral scaffolds was derived into phosphines, which served as efficient chiral ligands in palladium-catalyzed asymmetric reactions. Moreover, theoretical calculations provided an in-depth understanding of the reaction mechanism. This work offers a new strategy for constructing axially chiral indole-based scaffolds, which are promising for finding more applications in asymmetric catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available