4.6 Article

In situ observation of thermal runaway propagation in lithium-ion battery electrodes triggered by high-frequency induction heating

Journal

CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101465

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an in situ observation method for thermal runaway (TR) and its propagation (TRP) in lithium-ion battery electrodes was proposed using high-frequency induction heating as the TR triggering mechanism. The non-contact, rapid heating technique enabled direct observation of TRP. It was found that venting occurred in all samples and dendritic burn patterns appeared on separators during TRP. The heat-induced shrinkage of separators was more pronounced on the anode side. Phenomena observed during tests included gas flow paths, drifting sparks, short-circuit propagation, and electrolyte boiling. This method contributes to a better understanding of LIB TRP behavior and facilitates strategies to enhance safety and TR characteristics.
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are instrumental for electric vehicles, but safety is a concern due to thermal runaway (TR) events. In this study, an in situ observation method for TR and its propagation (TRP) in LIB electrodes is presented, employing high-frequency induction heating as the TR triggering method. The non-contact, rapid heating technique facilitates direct trigger of TRP in a self-made tempered glass observer. Experiments reveal that venting occurs in all samples, and dendritic burn patterns appear on separators upon TRP. The heat-induced shrinkage of separators is more pronounced on the anode side. Phenomena observed during tests include gas flow paths, drifting sparks, short-circuit propagation, and electrolyte boiling. This method may contribute to a better understanding of LIB TRP behavior, facilitating strategies to improve safety and TR characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available