4.4 Article

Longitudinal evolution of central nervous system anomalies in fetuses with open spina bifida fetoscopic repair and correlation with neurologic outcome

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100932

Keywords

brain; central nervous system; fetal surgery; magnetic reso-nance imaging; neurologic assessment; spina bifida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the changes in central nervous system anomalies before and after prenatal open spina bifida repair and their relationship with postnatal neurologic outcomes. The results showed a reduction in hindbrain herniation and a normalization of the clivus supraocciput angle after surgery, but no significant increase in abnormal corpus callosum or heterotopia. However, the presence of abnormal corpus callosum and severe ventriculomegaly was associated with an increased risk of suboptimal neurodevelopment.
BACKGROUND: Open spina bifida is associated with central nervous system anomalies such as abnormal corpus callosum and heterotopias. However, the impact of prenatal surgery over these structures remains unclear.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe longitudinal changes of cen-tral nervous system anomalies before and after prenatal open spina bifida repair and to evaluate their relationship with postnatal neurologic outcomes.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of fetuses with open spina bifida who underwent percutaneous fetoscopic repair from January 2009 to August 2020. All women had presurgical and postsurgical fetal magnetic resonance imaging, at an average of 1 week before and 4 weeks after surgery, respectively. We evaluated defect characteristics in the presurgical magnetic resonance images; and fetal head biometry, cli-vus supraocciput angle, and the presence of structural central nervous system anomalies, such as abnormalities in corpus callosum, heteroto-pias, ventriculomegaly, and hindbrain herniation, in both presurgical and postsurgical magnetic resonance images. Neurologic assessment was performed using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory scale in children who were 12 months or older, covering 3 different sections, namely self-care, mobility, and social and cognitive function. RESULTS: A total of 46 fetuses were evaluated. Presurgery and post-surgery magnetic resonance imaging were performed at a median gesta-tional age of 25.3 and 30.6 weeks, with a median interval of 0.8 weeks before surgery, and 4.0 weeks after surgery. There was a 70% reduction in hindbrain herniation (100% vs 32.6%; P<.001), and a normalization of the clivus supraocciput angle after surgery (55.3 [48.8-61.0] vs 79.9 [75.2-85.4]; P<.001). No significant increase in abnormal corpus cal-losum (50.0% vs 58.7%; P=.157) or heterotopia (10.8% vs 13.0%; P=.706) was observed. Ventricular dilation was higher after surgery (15.6 [12.7-18.1] vs 18.8 [13.7-22.9] mm; P<.001), with a higher propor-tion of severe ventricular dilation after surgery (>= 15mm) (52.2% vs 67.4%; P=.020). Thirty-four children underwent neurologic assessment, with 50% presenting a global optimal Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory result and 100% presenting a normal social and cognitive function. Children with optimal global Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory presented a lower rate of presurgical anomalies in corpus cal-losum and severe ventriculomegaly. When analyzed as independent varia-bles to global Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory scale, the presence of abnormal corpus callosum and severe ventriculomegaly showed an odds ratio of 27.7 (P=.025; 95% confidence interval, 1.53 -500.71) for a suboptimal result.CONCLUSION: Prenatal open spina bifida repair did not change the proportion of abnormal corpus callosum nor heterotopias after surgery. The combination of presurgical abnormal corpus callosum and severe ven-tricular dilation (>= 15 mm) is associated with an increased risk of subopti-mal neurodevelopment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available