3.8 Review

Culture-based prescribing to improve mental health: a scoping review protocol

Journal

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 1679-1686

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00211

Keywords

art on referral; culture-based prescribing; mental health; mental well-being; scoping review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this review is to investigate the effects of culture-based prescribing on improving mental health and well-being. Although culture-based prescribing shows promise as a community-based source of support, there is heterogeneity in the field regarding definition, underlying hypotheses, and cultural activity, which hinders further development and implementation.
Objective: The objective of this review is to investigate what is known about culture-based prescribing to improve mental health and well-being.Introduction: Culture-based prescribing, where a person is referred by a clinical professional to an arts or cultural activity aimed at improving mental health and well-being, is increasingly used as a community-based source of support. Although culture-based prescribing seems promising, the field is heterogeneous with respect to definition, underlying hypotheses, and cultural activity. This hampers its further development and implementation.Inclusion criteria: We will consider publications that report on or explore culture-based prescribing to improve mental health and well-being for adults with symptoms related to mental health conditions who are seeking care from any clinical professional.Methods: We will search 8 electronic literature databases for published or unpublished reports on culture-based prescribing, without date limits. We will also search for gray literature and screen reference lists of relevant reviews. No language restrictions will be applied during the screening process, but for data extraction, we will only extract studies in languages our team has proficiency in. The screening and data extraction will be performed by 2 reviewers, independently. Data analysis will be descriptive, with results tabulated separately for each subquestion. The results will be complemented with a narrative summary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available