3.8 Article

Evaluation and Management of Speech and Swallowing Issues in RFS

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40141-023-00388-5

Keywords

Late-RAD; Dysphagia; Survivorship; Radiation fibrosis syndrome; Head and neck cancer; Lower cranial nerve palsy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delayed onset of communication and swallowing dysfunction due to radiation-associated neuromuscular injury is a challenging clinical presentation in head and neck cancer rehabilitation. This review provides an evidence-based process for evaluating and treating this unique clinical entity. Rehabilitation interventions for radiation-fibrosis syndrome (RFS) include compensatory approaches, skill-based training, and restorative exercises, with ongoing research in this area.
Purpose of Review Delayed onset of communication and swallowing dysfunction due to radiation-associated neuromuscular injury is one of the most challenging clinical presentations in head and neck cancer rehabilitation. This review details the current literature and describes an evidence-based process for evaluating and treating this unique clinical entity. Recent Findings Radiation-fibrosis syndrome (RFS) is associated with lower cranial nerve palsy, dysphagia, trismus, dysarthria, dysphonia, and dyspnea. Sequelae of dysfunction can include feeding tube dependence, tracheostomy, depression, anxiety, and poor quality of life. While there is limited research evaluating rehabilitation efficacy explicitly in this population, the broader evidence base supports a multidimensional evaluation process and interventions that include compensatory approaches, skill-based training, and restorative exercises. Further evidence is forthcoming, with several ongoing randomized clinical trials exploring this topic. Summary Communication and swallowing dysfunction associated with RFS is debilitating, and treatment is intensive, often involving a phased approach with multiple specialties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available