4.4 Article

The Association of Caregivers' Socio-Economic Conditions with Family Caregiving Norms: Evidence from China

Journal

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bs13050362

Keywords

eldercare in China; family caregiving norms; caregivers' socio-economic conditions; aging population

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Similar to Japan, China faces challenges in providing long-term care for the elderly due to changes in demographics and socioeconomic factors. This study investigates the impact of socioeconomic factors on the perception of family caregiving norms in China, using a comparative household dataset. The results show that rural residency, household assets, and government dependency are positively associated with the perception of care. Interestingly, rural residents in China have a more positive perception of family caregiving norms compared to Japan, but women in rural areas perceive caregiving negatively.
Similar to her neighboring country, Japan, China faces significant difficulties in providing long-term care to the elderly. Female household members who traditionally provided necessary caregiving are no longer available as much as in the past due to the demographic and socioeconomic changes over the past few decades. Against this backdrop, we investigated how socioeconomic factors affect the perception of family caregiving norms in China, using an international comparative household dataset that allowed us to compare China with Japan, the latter being extensively investigated. We used ordered probit regression to estimate the model equation. Our results show that rural residency, household assets, and government dependency are positively associated with the perception of care. A notable difference from the Japanese results is that rural residents have a rather positive perception of family caregiving norms. Furthermore, urban-rural subsample analyses revealed that women in rural areas perceive caregiving negatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available