3.8 Article

Learning from sticky variables in cross-case analyses of collaboration in social-ecological systems

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2023.2187639

Keywords

Nadia Sitas; Social-ecological systems; collaboration; user rights; adaptability; shared vision; trust and social capital; collaborative outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of collaborative approaches to governing social-ecological systems (SES) towards transformative outcomes is widely acknowledged. Transdisciplinary approaches are emerging as key enablers of transformative collaborations in SES. Comparative case study research is a typical approach to studying complex collaborative initiatives and qualitative case studies are coded using predetermined variables to enable comparison and analysis.
The importance of collaborative approaches to governing social-ecological systems (SES) towards more transformative outcomes is now widely acknowledged. Theoretical and meth- odological frameworks to enable such collaborations are being developed across a range of disciplines. Transdisciplinary approaches are emerging as a key enabler of potentially trans- formative collaborations in SES, particularly where these are characterized by 'multiple multi- ples' (e.g. multiple scales, knowledge systems, etc.). A typical approach to studying complex collaborative initiatives across a range of contexts is comparative case study research, often relying on researchers embedded in cases. In this approach, qualitative case studies are coded using predetermined variables (based on ecological, social, and social-ecological features of cases) to enable comparison and cross-case analysis. In our experience, the process of coding qualitative cases into a quantitative analysis framework can be hampered by what we term 'sticky variables', i.e. variables which are difficult to code for reasons related to aspects of the intrinsic complexity of social-ecological systems. Based on cases from a range of geographic locations across the Global North and South, we identify sticky variables, and elucidate the reasons for their 'stickiness'. We propose several ways of working with and learning from sticky variables, and we reflect on theoretical, methodological and reflexive aspects of transdisciplinary research on collaborations. Moreover, we suggest that sticky variables might be 'flags' for interesting underlying factors that influence collaboration. We conclude by drawing out recommendations for researchers and practitioners confronted with the complexities and nuances of collaborations in social-ecological systems around the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available