4.5 Article

Stock profiling using time-frequency-varying systematic risk measure

Journal

FINANCIAL INNOVATION
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40854-023-00457-7

Keywords

Maximal overlap discrete wavelets transform; Time; Frequency-varying beta; Frequency rolling window; Risk-profile; Systematic risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a wavelets approach to estimating time-frequency-varying betas in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) framework. The dynamic of systematic risk across time and frequency is analyzed to investigate stock risk-profile robustness. We conclude that the standard CAPM assumes short-run investment. Then, investors should consider time-frequency CAPM to perform systematic risk analysis and portfolio allocation.
This study proposes a wavelets approach to estimating time-frequency-varying betas in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) framework. The dynamic of systematic risk across time and frequency is analyzed to investigate stock risk-profile robustness. Furthermore, we emphasize the effect of an investor's investment horizon on the robustness of portfolio characteristics. We use a daily panel of French stocks from 2012 to 2022. Results show that varying systematic risk varies in time and frequency, and that its short and long-run evolutions differ. We observe differences in short and long dynamics, indicating that a stock's betas differently fluctuate to early announcements or signs of events. However, short-run and long-run betas exhibit similar dynamics during persistent shocks. Betas are more volatile during times of crisis, resulting in greater or lesser robustness of risk profiles. Significant differences exist in short-run and long-run risk profiles, implying a different asset allocation. We conclude that the standard CAPM assumes short-run investment. Then, investors should consider time-frequency CAPM to perform systematic risk analysis and portfolio allocation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available