3.9 Article

Concentrations of organophosphate esters in drinking water from the United Kingdom: Implications for human exposure

Journal

EMERGING CONTAMINANTS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100203

Keywords

Daily intakes; Tap water; Reference dose and high -end exposure; scenario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured the concentrations of eight organophosphate esters (OPEs) in UK drinking water and found that tap water had significantly higher levels of OPEs compared to bottled water, particularly chlorinated, aryl-, and alkyl-OPEs. However, exposure to OPEs via drinking water was much lower than exposure through other pathways, such as food, indoor dust, inhalation, and dermal uptake. Nevertheless, when considering overall exposure, some OPEs in UK drinking water approached health-based limit values for toddlers.
Data on the presence of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in drinking water and its significance as a pathway of exposure are limited. In this study, we measure for the first time, concentrations of eight OPEs in 50 UK drinking water samples. Arithmetic mean concentrations of P8OPEs were: 6.4 and 11 ng/L in bottled (n = 25) and tap water samples (n = 25), respectively. Concentrations of P8OPEs in tap water (mean: 11 ng/L) exceed significantly those in bottled water (mean: 6.4 ng/L) (p < 0.01). Moreover, UK tap water is more contaminated with chlorinated, aryl-, and alkyl-OPEs than bottled water. The predominant OPEs detected were: tris (butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP), tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), and tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) with arithmetic mean concentrations in the two water sample types ranging between (3.5-3.8 ng/L), (0.60-3.0 ng/L), and (1.02-2.9 ng/L), respectively. Estimated daily intakes (EDIs) (mean and high-end exposure) via drinking water for different sectors of the UK popu-lation were: infants (0.93 and 6.4 ng/kg bw/day) > toddlers (0.46 and 3.1 ng/kg bw/day) > children (0.35 and 2.3 ng/kg bw/day) > adults (0.28 and 2.1 ng/kg bw/day). Based on these data, exposure to S8OPEs via drinking water is much lower than via: food, indoor dust ingestion, inhalation, and dermal uptake for adults and toddlers. Reassuringly, our EDIs were lower than relevant reference dose (RfD) values. However, combining our drinking water ingestion data with exposure via other pathways revealed overall exposure to 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP) and TCIPP to approach health-based limit values for UK toddlers under a high-end exposure scenario.(c) 2023 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available