4.6 Editorial Material

The Governance of Land Use: A Conceptual Framework

Journal

LAND
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land12030608

Keywords

land use; governance; spatial planning; strategic planning; public policy; comparative public policy; planning theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How land is used is connected to important issues such as sustainable development, economic development, territorial inequalities, and the rights of future generations. Various policies and factors beyond land use and environmental planning systems shape land use and management, leading to adverse outcomes. This paper introduces a conceptual framework that promotes the governance of land use by considering incentives, disincentives, and complementarities across different policies and practices.
How land is used is connected to some of the most important issues of our time: sustainable development, economic development, reducing territorial inequalities and the rights of future generations, to name but a few. There is growing recognition that a wide range of policies shape how land is used and managed beyond that of land use and environmental planning systems. From fiscal and tax incentives to industry subsidies and infrastructure or transportation program design, a myriad of incentives and disincentives shape the decisions and interventions that play out across our land, often leading to adverse outcomes, such as a loss of agricultural land, environmental degradation, high housing prices or costlier services. This paper shares a conceptual framework for the governance of land use encompassing a range of policies and other factors across scales that shape how land is used and managed. This framework encourages consideration of the incentives, disincentives and complementarities across a range of policies and practices and the need for stronger alignment to meet land management goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available