4.0 Article

Genomic investigation of antimicrobial resistance in Brucella abortus strains isolated from cattle in Brazil

Journal

GENE REPORTS
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2023.101777

Keywords

Brucellosis; Epidemiology; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Multidrug resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the genetic determinants responsible for antimicrobial resistance in 53 genomes of B. abortus strains isolated from cattle in Brazil. Eight genes associated with antimicrobial resistance were identified, but no association was found between the genetic polymorphisms in these genes and the observed resistance phenotypes in the Brazilian strains.
The emergence of resistance to antimicrobials among Brucella spp. has highlighted the need to understand the genetic determinants responsible for these phenotypes. We investigated the gene targets associated with anti-microbial resistance in 53 genomes of B. abortus strains, isolated from cattle in Brazil, with resistance or inter -mediate susceptibility to antimicrobials. The genetic diversity of the genomes was evaluated using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences among the isolates. We compared 18 genes (gyrB, bepD, bepE, nor-MII, norMI, parC, bepC, folP, gyrA, rpoB, folA, rsmG, marR, parE, mprF, oxyR, bepF, and bepG) previously described as related to antimicrobial resistance in Brucella spp. to those of the reference strain B. abortus 2308, which was susceptible to all tested antimicrobials. Eight genes had nonsynonymous mutations, deletions, or stop codons in at least one of the analyzed genomes. However, we did not observe any association between the genetic poly-morphisms in the evaluated genes and the antimicrobial resistance phenotypes observed in the Brazilian analyzed strains (46 intermediate susceptible to rifampicin, 6 resistance to at least one antimicrobial and 1 multidrug resistance).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available