4.2 Article

Understanding the effect of new US cervical cancer screening guidelines and modalities on patients' comprehension and reporting of their cervical cancer screening behavior

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

We're Not Taken Seriously: Describing the Experiences of Perceived Discrimination in Medical Settings for Black Women

Ariel Washington et al.

Summary: This study describes the experiences of perceived discrimination in medical settings for Black women and explores its impact on cervical cancer screening and prevention. The findings indicate that a majority of Black women in this study have experienced discrimination in medical settings, which has negatively affected their patient-provider relationship and medical trust. However, most of these women have still received cervical cancer screenings within the past three years and have seen a doctor within the past year.

JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES (2023)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Cervical Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Asian Indians in the United States: A Systematic Review

Regina Jillapalli et al.

Summary: The study shows that factors such as acculturation, education level, language, and cultural beliefs influence cervical cancer screening behaviors among Asian Indians in the United States. This systematic review provides insight for developing culturally sensitive interventions to increase awareness and engagement in cervical cancer screening among Asian Indians.

JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

TRUST AND MISTRUST IN SHAPING ADAPTATION AND DE-IMPLEMENTATION IN THE CONTEXT OF CHANGING SCREENING GUIDELINES

Rachel C. Shelton et al.

Summary: The study found that trust and mistrust are important but understudied social determinants of health among Ms, which have critical implications for shaping health inequities, and help explain and contextualize why new screening guidelines may not be fully embraced in the AA community.

ETHNICITY & DISEASE (2021)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Cervical cancer screening in the United States: Challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups

Lindsay N. Fuzzell et al.

Summary: Although cervical cancer screening rates are generally high in the United States, disparities exist among certain groups such as racial and ethnic minorities, rural residents, and sexual and gender minorities. Barriers to screening participation can be alleviated through potential solutions, policy changes, mobile screening, availability of interpreters, and community outreach initiatives.

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2021)

Article Oncology

Acceptability of a multicomponent, community-based, HPV self-test intervention among Jamaican women

Soroya Julian McFarlane et al.

Summary: Jamaican women have low participation in routine Pap test screening due to cultural and structural barriers. A community-based intervention, including education and self-testing for HPV, was found to increase screening rates effectively.

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL (2021)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences

Holly Nishimura et al.

Summary: The systematic review found that HPV self-sampling is a highly acceptable method of cervical cancer screening for women globally. Regardless of age, income or country of residence, most women found HPV self-sampling highly acceptable. Women prefer home-based self-sampling and cervical swab is the most common and accepted HPV DNA sampling device.

BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Self-collection for HPV-based cervical screening: a qualitative evidence meta-synthesis

Hawa Camara et al.

Summary: This review synthesizes qualitative research on self-collection for HPV-based testing for cervical screening and proposes strategies to address socio-cultural and structural barriers, aiming to increase acceptability and feasibility of self-collection. Implementing these strategies could significantly improve the effectiveness and sustainability of access to cervical screening services for women globally.

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)

Article Oncology

Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society

Elizabeth T. H. Fontham et al.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2020)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Low Human Papillomavirus Literacy Among Asian-American Women in California: an Analysis of the California Health Interview Survey

Monideepa B. Becerra et al.

JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES (2020)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Understanding Patients' Perspectives and Information Needs Following a Positive Home Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kit Result

Jasmin A. Tiro et al.

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH (2019)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Acceptability, Feasibility and Uptake of HPV Self-Sampling Among Immigrant Minority Women: a Focused Literature Review

Sarah Marshall et al.

JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH (2019)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Screening for Cervical Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Susan J. Curry et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Article Health Policy & Services

Cervical Cancer Screening Behaviors and Perceptions of Medical Mistrust among Rural Black and White Women

Marla B. Hall et al.

JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED (2018)

Review Pathology

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening and Outcomes

Laura W. Musselwhite et al.

ACTA CYTOLOGICA (2016)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Acceptability and Feasibility of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening

Kumar Ilangovan et al.

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH (2016)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Does social disadvantage affect the validity of self-report for cervical cancer screening?

Aisha K. Lofters et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH (2013)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Cognitive testing of physical activity and acculturation questions in recent and long-term Latino immigrants

David Berrigan et al.

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2010)

Article Oncology

Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: A meta-analysis

Garth H. Rauscher et al.

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2008)

Article Education & Educational Research

Applying cognitive response testing in message development and pre-testing

C. Lapka et al.

HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH (2008)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Acceptability of unsupervised HPV self-sampling using written instructions

J. Waller et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING (2006)