4.3 Article

Optimization of magnetosome production by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans using desirability function approach

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.060

Keywords

Magnetosome; Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans; Response surface methodology; Desirability function; Optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100006, 41471201]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [QC2014C023, C201442]
  3. University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heliongliang Province [UNPYSCT-2015086]
  4. Program of Science and Technology Innovation Teams Building in Heilongjiang Province [2012TD006]
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201308230032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Present study aimed to resolve the conflict between cell growth and magnetosome formation of Acidithiobocillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) in batch experiments by applying response surface methodology (RSM) integrated a desirability function approach. The effects of several operating parameters on cell growth (OD600) and magnetosome production (C-mag) were evaluated. The maximum overall desirability (D) of 0.923 was achieved at iron concentration of 125.07 mM, shake speed of 12237 rpm and nitrogen concentration of 2.40 g/L Correspondingly, the OD500 and C-mag were 0.522 and 1,196, respectively. The confirmation experiment confirmed that the optimum OD600 and C-mag obtained were in good agreement with the predicted values. The inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses revealed that the production of magnetosomes could be improved via optimization. X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed the magnetosomes are magnetite. Results indicated that RSM with a desirability function was a useful technique to get the maximum OD600 and C-mag simultaneously. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available