4.0 Article

First draft genome and transcriptome of Cercosporidium personatum, causal agent of late leaf spot disease of peanut

Journal

BMC RESEARCH NOTES
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06331-0

Keywords

Late leaf spot; Genome; RNA polymerase; Ribosomal RNA; Peanut; Cercosporidium; Nothopassalora

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two main fungal leaf spot diseases, early leaf spot and late leaf spot, cause an average of $44 million losses in peanut production annually. This study provides essential genetic information about the causative agent of late leaf spot, which is crucial for further research on this pathogen.
ObjectiveTwo main fungal leaf spot diseases occur in peanut, namely early leaf spot (ELS) and late leaf spot (LLS), these cause a yearly average of $44 million losses. Limited genetic information, 3534 bp of sequencing, exists about the causal agent of LLS, Cercosporidium personatum (syn. Nothopassalora personata, syn. Phaeoisariopsis personata). The extremely slow growth of this fungus, approximately 1 cm colony in 6 months, and challenges in nucleic acid extractions have hindered research on LLS. Our goal in this work is to provide a reference genome for research on this pathogen.ResultsWhole genome and transcriptome sequencing of the LLS fungus were obtained. A total of 233,542,110 reads of the genome were de novo assembled resulting in 1061 scaffolds, and estimated genome size 27,597,787 bp. RNA sequencing resulted in 11,848,198 reads that were de novo assembled into 13,343 contigs. Genome annotation resulted in 10,703 putative genes. BUSCO analysis of the genome and annotation resulted in 91.1% and 89.5% completeness, respectively. Phylogenetic dendrograms for 5442 bp and 4401 bp of RNA Polymerase II largest and second largest subunits, and for 5474 bp of the ribosomal RNA cistron of C. personatum are presented in relation to closely related fungi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available