3.8 Article

Did #METOO advance the feminist movement in China? A typical Chinese case study of sexual harassment. Impact of power relations and morality

Journal

METHAODOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

UNIV REY JUAN CARLOS, FAC CIENCIAS JURIDICAS & SOCIALES
DOI: 10.17502/mrcs.v11i1.619

Keywords

Chinese universities; frame analysis; #METOO; sexual harassment; teacher image

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The #METOO campaign in 2017 drew worldwide attention to sexual harassment, including cases in Chinese universities. This study examines news reports on typical cases after the rise of #METOO, using framing theory and content analysis. It found that Chinese media mostly used social and individual frames, rarely using the gender discrimination frame. Although the media actively promoted progress and solutions to sexual harassment, they focused on power relations rather than addressing the issue of sexism. This approach may further impact the image of teachers in China, leading to negative stereotypes.
The #METOO campaign sparked worldwide attention to the issue of sexual harassment in 2017. Shortly afterward, sexual harassment cases also followed in Chinese universities. This study uses framing theory and content analysis, analyzing typical case news reports after the rise of the #METOO movement. Firstly, the study showed that Chinese news media mostly reported with social frame and individual frame, and seldom used the gender discrimination frame. Secondly, Although Chinese media actively promoted the progress and solution of sexual harassment cases, they mainly solved the problem from the perspective of power relations and failed to continue to dig into the problem of sexism. However, the way of reporting from the perspective of power relations may further influence the teachers' image in China and even bring negative stereotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available