4.6 Article

Cellularized versus decellularized scaffolds for bone regeneration

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 318-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.152

Keywords

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells; Biomaterials; Bone regeneration; Polymers; Scaffold

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2013/09055-2, 2013/20554-0]
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPq
  4. SKELGEN project - Establishment of a cross continent consortium for enhancing regenerative medicine in skeletal tissues (Marie Curie Action, International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES)) [318553]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An optimal scaffold based strategy for in vivo repair of large bone defects and its associated problems is presented in this work. Three polymeric scaffolds produced by using an extrusion-based additive manufacturing system were examined in a rat critical bone defect model: scaffolds without cells, with undifferentiated Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) and differentiated ADSCs (osteoblasts). Scaffolds with undifferentiated cells seem to be the best strategy as they exhibited around 22% more bone formation than natural bone healing, and around 15% more than the two other cases. Authors observed that scaffolds enabled cell migration and tissue formation. Results suggest that undifferentiated ADSCs strongly contribute to new bone formation with no rejection if scaffolds are used to support cell migration, proliferation and differentiation. Our long-term goal is to engineer high-quality cell seeded scaffolds (autograft and allograft) for bone regeneration, mainly in elderly patients. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available