3.8 Article

Wir beideund ?? c Ba?i (,wir mit Ihnen'): Strategien zur Vagheitsreduktion im Gebrauch des Personalpronomens der 1. Person Plural in deutschen und russischen Diagnosemitteilungs- und Therapieplanungsgesprachen

Journal

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 88-123

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/zgl-2023-2003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the strategies used by doctors to clarify the referential scope of the personal pronoun "we". In clinical practice, doctors have different roles and levels of agency and responsibility when interacting with patients. Patients need to understand whether they are included in the "we" or not. Analyzing therapy planning talks from German and Russian oncological clinical departments, the study identifies the strategies used by doctors to locally clarify the range of "we", such as adding numerals or locative phrases.
This paper examines the strategies doctors use to disambiguate the referential scope of the personal pronoun we. In clinical practice, doctors have to manage the different roles in which they can interact with the patients, - as individuals, as representatives of their clinic or their clinical department or as members of the scientific community of medical experts. These different roles also combine with different degrees of agentivity and responsibility. Patients therefore have to decode whether they are included into the we or not. Based on a corpus of more than 90 therapy planning talks recorded at German and Russian oncological clinical departments, our empirical study analyzes which strategies doctors employ to locally clarify the range of we, e. g., by adding a numeral (we two) or a locative phrase (we in this clinic) in order to ensure mutual understanding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available