3.8 Article

The permanently minority people: Palestinian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon, (Attempted) social death and desire to return

Journal

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2172804

Keywords

Palestinian refugees; minorities; Lebanon refugee camp; Jordan refugee camp; social death; Israel; desire to return

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article argues that the Israeli regime is causing a form of social death for Palestinian refugees by dispossessing them of their lands and denying their existence. It suggests that the Palestinian resistance can serve as an anti-thesis to this social death, using it as fuel for their resistance. The article also explores the relationship between social death and the hope for return, and analyzes the challenges in universalizing solutions to the refugee crisis, specifically for Palestinian refugees in Lebanese and Jordanian camps.
Seventy-three years, seven million people in exile; it has been this long since the Palestinian diaspora set foot. By expanding the Social Death theory to include territory bounded culture, this paper argues that Israeli regime is inflicting an (attempted) social death upon Palestinian refugees by dispossessing them of their lands and denying their existence. This article attempts to unlatch another portal by exhibiting the possibility of creating an anti-thesis to the Social Death theory by the Palestinian resistance. Thus, showing the very act of Israel's attempted social death becomes the very fuel for the Palestinian resistance to social death. We also illustrate the interconnection between social death and hope to return, allowing another room for analysis of refugee's desirability to return and the problems of universalisation of solutions to the refugee crisis, in particular the cases of Palestinian refugees in Lebanese and Jordanian refugee camps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available