3.8 Article

Development and pilot of the Alcohol and Depression Decision-Aid for Psychological Treatments (ADDAPT)

Journal

ADVANCES IN DUAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/ADD-10-2022-0028

Keywords

Alcohol use; Depression; Comorbidity; Psychological treatment; Decisional conflict; Alcohol; Patient decision-aid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to test the acceptability, feasibility, safety, and potential usefulness of the Alcohol and Depression Decision-Aid for Psychological Treatments (ADDAPT) for individuals with depression and alcohol use comorbidity. The findings showed that most participants found ADDAPT easy to use, helpful in decision making, and trustworthy, without provoking anxiety. Participants felt confident in their treatment decisions, demonstrated good treatment knowledge, and made choices based on best available evidence.
PurposeEvidence is lacking as to the superiority of dual-focused versus single-focused approaches in treating depression and alcohol use comorbidity. Different people may also value the different features of treatment options differently, necessitating a decision-support tool. This study aims to test the acceptability, feasibility, safety and potential usefulness of the Alcohol and Depression Decision-Aid for Psychological Treatments (ADDAPT). Design/methodology/approachADDAPT was developed according to International Patient Decision-Aid Standards and in consultation with potential end users. Adults with depression and alcohol use comorbidity, who were considering/recently considered psychological treatments, were recruited via online advertisements. After clicking on the study URL, participants accessed the ADDAPT e-book and completed validated and purpose-designed questionnaires. FindingsOf the 24 participants, most would recommend ADDAPT to others (79.2% agree) and endorsed it as easy-to-use (75%), useful in decision-making (79.2%), presenting balanced (87.5%), up-to-date (91.7%), easy-to-understand (79.2%) and trustworthy information (83.3%), which did not provoke anxiety (i.e. safety; 75%). Post-use, participants felt well prepared to decide on treatment (M = 3.48/5) and demonstrated good treatment knowledge (M = 65.83%). All but one participant indicated a treatment choice supported by best available evidence, and decisional conflict scores except for the uncertainty subscale were below the threshold for decisional delay (all M < 37.5/100). Originality/valueADDAPT is the first decision-aid of its kind, with pilot findings supporting its acceptability, feasibility, safety and potential usefulness for improving decision-making quality among people considering psychological treatment options for depression and alcohol use comorbidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available