4.1 Article

Production of PHB from Chicory Roots - Comparison of Three Cupriavidus necator Strains

Journal

CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 99-112

Publisher

CROATIAN SOC CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.15255/CABEQ.2014.2250

Keywords

Cichorium intybus; fructose; inulin; by-product; food residue; pre-treatment; hydrolysate; batch fermentation; Cupriavidus necator; P3HB; polymer characterisation

Funding

  1. Federal State of Lower Austria
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of the European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chicory roots from hydroponic salad cultivation are an abundant food residue in Navarra (Spain) that are underutilized to date. Aiming at a holistic utilization of resources, we report here the first process using chicory root hydrolysate for the production of poly([R]-3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB). The polymer can be used for packaging material made for the locally produced vegetables. In the first step, we developed a pre-treatment process to obtain a hydrolysate, which contained 34 g L-1 sugars and 0.7 g L-1 total Kjeldahl nitrogen. This hydrolysate was used as fermentation substrate for three PHB-producing strains. Cupriavidus necator DSM 428 reached a dry biomass concentration of 11.3 g L-1 with a PHB content of 66 % in dry mass within 5 days. C. necator DSM 531 yielded 3.5 g L-1 dry biomass containing 46 % PHB within the same period. C. necator DSM 545 was superior over the other two in that 14.0 g L-1 of biomass containing 78 % PHB after only 3 days were obtained. These results show that even within the same species, the productivities on natural substrates are very different. The produced polymers were extracted using chloroform, and several thermo-physical parameters are in good accordance with published data. Overall, our holistic approach and the encouraging results prove that chicory roots are a viable fermentation substrate for PHB-production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available