3.9 Article

Photon-noise: is a single-pixel camera better than point scanning? A signal-to-noise ratio analysis for Hadamard and Cosine positive modulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-PHOTONICS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7647/acc70b

Keywords

computational imaging; single-pixel camera; single-pixel detection; multiplexing disadvantage; shot-noise; photon-noise

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a single-pixel camera, the object is illuminated by intensity patterns and reconstructed computationally from the total reflected or transmitted intensity measured by a single-pixel detector. We investigate whether a single-pixel camera performs better than point raster scanning in the presence of photon-noise, and find that positive intensity modulation based on Hadamard or Cosine patterns does not necessarily improve the single-to-noise ratio (SNR) of single-pixel cameras. However, the SNR is improved on object pixels at least k times brighter than the object mean signal, where k depends on the modulation scheme.
In a single-pixel camera, an unknown object is sequentially illuminated by intensity patterns. The total reflected or transmitted intensity is summed in a single-pixel detector from which the object is computationally reconstructed. In the situation where the measurements are limited by photon-noise, it is questionable whether a single-pixel camera performs better or worse than simply scanning the object with a focused intensity spot-a modality known as point raster scanning and employed in many laser scanning systems. Here, we solve this general question and report that positive intensity modulation based on Hadamard or Cosine patterns does not necessarily improve the single-to-noise ratio (SNR) of single-pixel cameras, as compared to point raster scanning (RS). Instead, we show that the SNR is only improved on object pixels at least k times brighter than the object mean signal (x) over bar, where k is a constant that depends on the modulation scheme (modulation matrix, number of detectors, etc). The constant k is derived for several widespread cases and has important consequences on the choice of the optical deign. This fundamental property is demonstrated theoretically, numerically, and is experimentally confirmed in the spatial domain (widefield fluorescence imaging) and in the spectral domain (spontaneous Raman spectral measurements). Finally, we provide user-oriented guidelines that help decide when and how multiplexing under photon-noise should be used instead of point RS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available