3.8 Review

Designing Clinical Trials to Assess the Impact of Pharmacological Treatment for Suicidal Ideation/Behavior: Issues and Potential Solutions

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICINE
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 221-232

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40290-023-00467-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Suicide is a significant public health concern, but the availability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) informing pharmacologic treatment is limited. This review highlights the need for such trials and discusses examples of trials studying patients at elevated risk of suicide. Existing studies on psychotropic medications and psychotherapy interventions provide valuable insights for trial design. Medications studied in individuals at risk for suicide include lithium, clozapine, zolpidem, prazosin, ketamine, esketamine, and aripiprazole. Although there are design challenges, RCTs investigating suicide prevention are feasible and much needed.
Suicide is a serious and growing public health concern yet randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that inform pharmacologic treatment remain limited. We emphasize the overall need for such trials and review the literature to highlight examples of trials that have aimed to study patients at elevated risk of suicide. We discuss key examples of existing psychotropic medication trials as well as psychotherapy intervention studies that can yield important design insights. Medications that have been studied in individuals at risk for suicide include lithium, clozapine, zolpidem, prazosin, ketamine, esketamine, and aripiprazole. While important design challenges should be considered-RCTs to study suicide are feasible and much needed. Issues such as overall trial design, patient-selection criteria, and the scales/tools used to assess suicidality are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available