3.8 Article

Human consumption of meat from roadkilled animals in the southwestern Amazon

Journal

ETHNOBIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

UNIV ESTADUAL PARAIBA, EDITORA-EDUEP
DOI: 10.15451/ec2023-03-12.07-1-9

Keywords

Hunting; Bushmeat; Vehicle collision; Wild meat; Mammals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The consumption of meat from roadkilled animals by local residents in the state of Rondonia has been reported in this study. Although it is not a common practice, some individuals deliberately run over animals to obtain meat. The meat from roadkilled animals may pose health risks due to potential foodborne diseases and it can also have negative impacts on both wildlife populations and human safety.
The harvest of meat from wild animals is essential for the nutrition of many human populations in the Neotropics. Specific techniques are used to access wild meat in this region, but collecting meat from road killed animals, or purposely run over animals to kill and consume the meat have not been documented so far. In this study we interviewed four residents of the state of Rondonia who claimed to consume roadkilled animals. Respondents cited only medium and large mammals (10 species in total) as the group from which wild meat is harvested, with one respondent claiming to intentionally run over the animals. The interviewees analyse the smell/putrefaction condition, swelling and exposure of viscera as criteria for not collecting the meat. The meat from roadkilled animals may pose a risk to the health of humans who consume it due to the foodborne diseases it may spread after the decomposition process. In addition, the practice of running over animals for consumption of their meat can cause potential impacts to the fauna and humans since it can reduce animal numbers and also cause serious accidents. Further investigations are needed to clarify whether this is widespread phenomenon occurring in other places of the Amazon and the Neotropics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available