4.0 Article

Innovation Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effects of Contextual Factors

Journal

ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/erj-2022-0138

Keywords

ambidexterity; firm performance; GUESSS; contextual factors; normative institutions; cognitive institutions; moderating effects

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of motivating and contextual factors on the relationship between innovation ambidexterity and firm performance. The results indicate a positive relationship between ambidexterity and firm performance, and this relationship is moderated by motivating factors, number of co-owners, and normative and cognitive institutions. The findings offer important insights for promoting entrepreneurial education and contribute to the existing theory by exploring the role of individual and contextual factors in the relationship between ambidexterity and firm performance.
The purpose of this paper is to assess the moderating effects of motivating and contextual factors on the relationship of innovation ambidexterity and firm performance. A theoretical framework was developed and tested using survey data from a sample of the Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students' Survey (GUESSS). The results suggest a positive effect of ambidexterity on firm performance, which is positively moderated by motivating factors, the number of co-owners and normative and cognitive institutions, such as power distance and university environment and program learning, respectively. The study provides important insights for policymakers to promote entrepreneurial education and clues for future research, as well as extends existing theory by offering insights on the moderator effects of individual and contextual factors on the relationship between ambidexterity and firm performance, assuming the benefits of the synergic effects of exploration and exploitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available