4.2 Article

Backchannels in conversations between autistic adults are less frequent and less diverse prosodically and lexically

Journal

LANGUAGE AND COGNITION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2023.21

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; conversation; backchannels; feedback; response tokens; intonation; prosody; entropy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Backchannels (BCs) are commonly used listener signals in spoken interaction, but little is known about their use by individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A study of dialogue recordings in German revealed that the ASD group used BCs at a lower rate, with less diversity in lexical realization and less flexibility in intonation contour mapping compared to the non-autistic group. These findings indicate different attention signaling strategies and less flexible behavior in social interaction among autistic individuals.
Backchannels (BCs; listener signals such as 'mmhm' or 'okay') are a ubiquitous and essential feature of spoken interaction. They are used by listeners predominantly to support the ongoing turn of their interlocutor and to signal understanding and agreement. Listeners seem to be highly sensitive to the exact realisations of BCs and to judge deviations from typical forms as negative. Very little is known about the use of BCs by speakers diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In dialogue recordings of 28 German adults in two groups of disposition-matched dyads (i.e., both interlocutors were either autistic or non-autistic), we found that the ASD group was characterised by (1) a lower rate of BCs per minute (particularly in the early stages of conversation), (2) less diversity in the lexical realisation of BCs and (3) a less diverse and flexible mapping of different intonation contours to different BC types. We interpret these results as reflecting more general characteristics of autistic as compared to non-autistic individuals, namely different strategies in signalling attention towards an interlocutor and less flexible behaviour in social interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available