4.7 Article

Estimation of mercury background values in sediment and biota of the Bijagos archipelago, Guinea-Bissau

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 111, Issue 1-2, Pages 488-492

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.053

Keywords

Mercury; Sediments; Bivalves; Background concentrations; West Africa

Funding

  1. Strategic Funding through national funds provided by FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/Multi/04423/2013 (CIIMAR), UID/AMB/50017 (CESAM), UID/MAR/04292/2013 (MARE)]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. MAVA Foundation through Evaluation et conservation de la biodiversite dans le Parc National Marin de Joao Vieira e Poilao [11-070]
  4. national funds through post-doctoral grants from FCT [BPD/102870/2014, SFRH/BPD/102255/2014, SFRH/BPD/84237/2012, SFRH/BPD/102637/2014]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/Multi/04423/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work evaluates the mercury (Hg) contamination status (sediments and biota) of the Bijagos archipelago, off the coast of Guinea-Bissau. Sediments exhibited very low concentrations (<1-12 ng g(-1)), pointing to negligible sources of anthropogenic Hg in the region. Nevertheless, Hg is well correlated to the fine fraction, aluminium, and loss on ignition, indicating the effect of grain size and organic matter content on the presence of Hg in sediments. Mercury in the bivalves Tagelus adansoni and Senilia senilis did not vary considerably among sites, ranging within narrow intervals (0.09-0.12 and 0.12-0.14 mu g g(-1) (dry weight), respectively). Divergent substrate preferences/feeding tactics may justify slight differences between species. The value 11 ng g(-1) is proposed as the sediment background concentration for this West-African coastal region, and concentrations within the interval 8-10 ng g(-1) (wet weight) may be considered as reference range for S. senilis and T. adansoni in future monitoring studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available