3.8 Article

Effect of the armchair and zigzag edge terminations on the properties of nanohelicenes: First-principles study

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocom.2023.e00826

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The work presents a comparison of armchair and zigzag terminated nanohelicenes in terms of their structural, mechanical, electronic, and magnetic properties. The study shows that these nanohelicenes are metals in their most symmetric state but undergo a spontaneous symmetry breaking, resulting in a metal-insulator transition. It is found that the type of edge termination (armchair or zigzag) determines the type of metal-insulator transition in the global energy minima. The study also reveals that the edge terminations and transition types influence the helical electronic bands, and that the van der Waals forces between coils are stronger in the case of zigzag termination.
The work presents a comparison of the structural, mechanical, electronic and magnetic properties of armchair and zigzag terminated nanohelicenes, using the first principles density functional calculations. It was found that these nanohelicenes are metals in their most symmetric state, but undergo a spontaneous symmetry breaking which results in a metal-insulator transition (MIT). It was shown that the edge termination (armchair or zigzag) determines the type of the MIT in the global energy minima. The armchair terminated nanohelicene undergoes a Peierls MIT and it is a diamagnetic semiconductor. The zigzag terminated nanohelicenes is an antiferromagnetic semiconductor due to a Mott-Hubbard MIT. It was shown that the edge terminations and MIT type influence on helical electronic bands. Analysis of non-covalent interactions demonstrates that the van der Waals forces between coils are stronger in the case of zigzag termination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available