3.9 Article

Modelling the maize marketed surplus behaviour under risk and time preference conditions: The case of Zvimba and Mokonde districts of Zimbabwe

Journal

COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2218724

Keywords

Marketed surplus; risk aversion; time preference; food crop; Heckman sample selection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Heckman sample selection technique was used to model households' maize marketed surplus decision. The study showed that maize surplus households followed a sequential decision process when selling through the private buyer market and a simultaneous decision process when selling through the state-owned Grain Marketing Board market. The findings suggest that maize surplus households have bargaining power in the private buyer market and may not be attracted to high-return incentives offered by government parastatals due to risk aversion and time impatience.
The Heckman sample selection technique was applied in modelling the households' maize marketed surplus decision under risk and time preference assumption. We assumed that maize returns depend on farmers' market selection choices. We then applied the sample selection model to explain why maize surplus households shunned the uncertain, high-return state-owned Grain Marketing Board (GMB), with delayed payment system in favour of the more certain, low-return private buyer market, with immediate payment system. In the process, we tested whether the marketed surplus decisions followed a sequential or simultaneous decision process. Using survey data collected from 433 households from Zvimba and Makonde districts, the results confirmed that households followed a sequential decision process when selling through the private buyer market and a simultaneous decision process when selling through the GMB market. These findings implied two things; firstly maize surplus households could exercise some bargaining power in the private buyer market even if they got less. Secondly, in the presence of uncertainty and payment delays, high-return incentive offered through government parastatals may not be sufficient to attract maize surplus, as households may not sufficiently respond, due to risk aversion attitude and time impatient behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available