☆ 4.3 Article

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users

Chantelle Garritty et al.

Summary: Rapid reviews (RRs) are useful tools for evidence synthesis in urgent healthcare decision-making. However, involving knowledge users (KUs) in RRs, especially patients, is often overlooked. This paper emphasizes the importance of involving KUs, including patients and the public, in RRs to ensure their relevance and applicability for decision-making. It provides guidance on how to involve KUs throughout the review process and presents a case study demonstrating patient and public involvement in developing RRs. Striking a balance between rapidity and meaningful KU involvement is crucial.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment

Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit et al.

Summary: This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (RRMG). It discusses considerations around the acceleration of study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment in rapid reviews (RRs). The paper suggests methodological shortcuts such as dual screening at the title/abstract level, single data extraction on relevant data points, and single risk of bias assessment on important outcomes with verification by a second person.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence

Gerald Gartlehner et al.

Summary: This paper is a part of a series of methodological guidance provided by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group, which explains that rapid reviews (RRs) are designed to speed up the review process while maintaining systematic and transparent methods. The paper focuses on considerations for rating the certainty of evidence (COE) in RRs and provides recommendations for the implementation of GRADE. It also suggests alternative approaches for rating COE if full implementation of GRADE is not feasible.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Information Science & Library Science

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews

Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al.

Summary: This document presents the PRISMA-S checklist, developed through a Delphi survey process and public review. The checklist includes sixteen reporting items, with exemplar reporting and rationale, aiming to ensure complete reporting of literature search components for reproducibility.

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

Chantelle Garritty et al.

Summary: The study aims to develop guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews, with 26 recommendations presented based on survey results. These recommendations will help synthesize evidence for urgent health issues, but the guidance will need to be updated as new evaluations for some RR methods are conducted due to the current lack of available evidence.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review

B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al.

Summary: The study aimed to investigate the resource use and reasons for resource intensity during systematic review production. Project management and administration, study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal were found to be the areas with the largest resource use.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Research methodology and characteristics of journal articles with original data, preprint articles and registered clinical trial protocols about COVID-19

Mahir Fidahic et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews

Lisa Affengruber et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic

Silvia Gianola et al.

PLOS ONE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance

Monica Casey et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Information Science & Library Science

Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial

Justin Michael Clark et al.

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

PubMed coverage varied across specialties and over time: a large-scale study of included studies in Cochrane reviews

Tove Faber Frandsen et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study

Iain J. Marshall et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Information Science & Library Science

Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval

Jose Antonio Salvador-Olivan et al.

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews

Wichor M. Bramer et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: A case study from public health and environmental enhancement

Chris Cooper et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Trial registry searches for randomized controlled trials of new drugs required registry-specific adaptation to achieve adequate sensitivity

Marco Knelangen et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study

Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies

Chris Cooper et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study

Wichor M. Bramer et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Testing the effectiveness of simplified search strategies for updating systematic reviews

Maureen Rice et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

Lisa Hartling et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Complementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating systematic reviews

Margaret Sampson et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

Jessie McGowan et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist

Paul Garner et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist

Paul Garner et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study

Wichor M. Bramer et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: critical reflections on three case studies

Jean Adams et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions

Christopher W. Halladay et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Information Science & Library Science

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Paul Levay et al.

EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Routine development of objectively derived search strategies

Elke Hausner et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2012)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.