☆ 4.3 Article

Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment

Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit et al.

Summary: This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (RRMG). It discusses considerations around the acceleration of study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment in rapid reviews (RRs). The paper suggests methodological shortcuts such as dual screening at the title/abstract level, single data extraction on relevant data points, and single risk of bias assessment on important outcomes with verification by a second person.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence

Gerald Gartlehner et al.

Summary: This paper is a part of a series of methodological guidance provided by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group, which explains that rapid reviews (RRs) are designed to speed up the review process while maintaining systematic and transparent methods. The paper focuses on considerations for rating the certainty of evidence (COE) in RRs and provides recommendations for the implementation of GRADE. It also suggests alternative approaches for rating COE if full implementation of GRADE is not feasible.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search

Irma Klerings et al.

Summary: This paper discusses considerations for conducting rapid reviews (RR), including steps for preparation, planning, information sources, search methods, strategy development, quality assurance, reporting, and record management. To reduce the workload of literature screening, it is recommended to invest time in planning and optimizing the search process, work with an information specialist, select relevant information sources, and use search methods that are likely to identify relevant literature. Quality assurance measures such as peer review and validation of search strategies should be applied to minimize errors.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Evaluating the Impacts of Patient Engagement on Health Services Research Teams: Lessons from the Veteran Consulting Network

Vanessa L. Merker et al.

Summary: This study explores the impacts of engaging patients as consultants in research at a Veterans Health Administration research center. It found that patient engagement improved the quality and relevance of research studies, and had personal benefits for both researchers and patients.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Methodological guidance for incorporating equity when informing rapid-policy and guideline development

Omar Dewidar et al.

Summary: This article provides guidance for considering equity in rapid reviews, using examples from published COVID-19 rapid reviews. By involving relevant stakeholders, reflecting on team values and composition, and developing research questions, among other key steps, equity considerations in rapid reviews can be improved, helping policymakers better understand the distributional impact of diseases on populations.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

Claire Beecher et al.

Summary: This article presents the findings of a study that identified and prioritized unanswered research questions on rapid review methodology through large-scale surveys and discussions. The results will guide future research on rapid review methodology and aim to improve the quality of evidence produced.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group

Danielle Pollock et al.

Summary: Knowledge user consultation is important in scoping reviews, but there is currently a lack of research in this area. This paper presents JBI's guidance for knowledge user engagement in scoping reviews, emphasizing the benefits of consultation and how to report and evaluate it.

JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews

Candyce Hamel et al.

Summary: Through a systematic scoping review, definitions from 216 rapid reviews and 90 rapid review methods articles were thematically analyzed, identifying eight key themes that can help inform the systematic review community in defining rapid review products.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

Chantelle Garritty et al.

Summary: The study aims to develop guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews, with 26 recommendations presented based on survey results. These recommendations will help synthesize evidence for urgent health issues, but the guidance will need to be updated as new evaluations for some RR methods are conducted due to the current lack of available evidence.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews: Lessons From Cochrane's Public Health and Health Systems Network

Bronwen Merner et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Infectious Diseases

Rapid reviews for rapid decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Norway, 2020

Atle Fretheim et al.

EUROSURVEILLANCE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Health Policy & Services

Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study

Chantelle Garritty et al.

HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Laura P. Forsythe et al.

HEALTH AFFAIRS (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Engaging knowledge users in a systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led models of care is possible: A cross-sectional survey using the Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool

Charlene Soobiah et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Characteristics of stakeholder involvement in systematic and rapid reviews: a methodological review in the area of health services research

Jonas Feldmann et al.

BMJ OPEN (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR)

Abdullah Pandor et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Health Policy & Services

Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews

Alex Pollock et al.

JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Carrie D. Patnode et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Engaging policy-makers, heath system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Development and pre-testing of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) to assess the quality of engagement from a patient perspective

Clayon B. Hamilton et al.

PLOS ONE (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Health Policy & Services

Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful?

Gabriel Moore et al.

HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research

S. Staniszewska et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research

S. Staniszewska et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews

Lisa Hartling et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts

Lisa Hartling et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Nursing

The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach

Zachary Munn et al.

WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING (2015)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Thomas W. Concannon et al.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

What The Evidence Shows About Patient Activation: Better Health Outcomes And Care Experiences; Fewer Data On Costs

Judith H. Hibbard et al.

HEALTH AFFAIRS (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement

Patricia A. Deverka et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2012)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach

Sara Khangura et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Education, Scientific Disciplines

Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: Knowledge transfer for policy and practice

Kiera Keown et al.

JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS (2008)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Consumer-driven health care: Building partnerships in research

B Shea et al.

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2005)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.