4.5 Article

Compressibility and strength behavior of marine soils solidified with MgO-A green and low carbon binder

Journal

MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 878-886

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2016.1258095

Keywords

Compressibility; compressive strength; marine soils; MgO; solidification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51609180]
  2. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2016CFB115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although extensive research has been conducted on the soil solidification with traditional binders such as lime and cement, there has been less emphasis on the mechanical behavior of marine soils solidified with a novel type of binder MgO. The experimental tests were performed to investigate the strength and compressibility behavior of MgO-solidified soils, taking into consideration curing time and MgO content. The results show that the yielding stress sigma'(y) tends to increase with curing time and MgO content, but drops as the initial void ratio e(0) and void ratio e(y) at sigma'(y) increase. The incorporation of MgO leads to an important reduction in compression index C-c and recompression index C-r. The unconfined test analysis indicates that an increasing trend can be observed for unconfined compressive strength qu and deformation modulus E-50 when evaluating the effect of curing time and MgO content, accompanied by a decrease in failure strain epsilon(f) and a slight drop of q(u) at 28 days. The improvement of mechanical performance is attributed to the hydration process of MgO with water, producing an alkaline environment and precipitation of Mg(OH)(2). Based on the confined and unconfined compression test results, an effort is made to establish the correlations between characteristic parameters, including C-c vs. e(0), sigma'(y) vs. e(0), sigma'(y) vs. e(y), q(u) vs. epsilon(f), and q(u) vs. E-50.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available