4.0 Review

Towards a Checklist for Improving Action Research Quality in Healthcare Contexts

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake

Y. de Jong et al.

Summary: The uptake of COREQ and ENTREQ guidelines in qualitative reviews was found to be modest, but primary qualitative studies showed improvement in reporting quality, potentially facilitated by the publication of COREQ guidelines.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)

Review Management

Action research in business and management: A reflective review

Abraham B. (Rami) Shani et al.

Summary: This article explores the role of action research in generating actionable knowledge in business and management, and identifies common denominators that can guide future research and action. Through reflection on a small number of studies, the authors provide insights for further research and future development in the field.

ACTION RESEARCH (2021)

Article Nursing

A matter of taste: evaluating the quality of qualitative research

Margarete Sandelowski

NURSING INQUIRY (2015)

Article Management

Creating Action Research Quality in Organization Development: Rigorous, Reflective and Relevant

David Coghlan et al.

SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH (2014)

Article Education & Educational Research

The issue of quality in qualitative research

Martyn Hammersley

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION (2007)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

How can action research apply to health services?

B Morrison et al.

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2001)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials - A comparative before-and-after evaluation

D Moher et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2001)