4.1 Article

'How dare you!': a conceptualization of the eco-shaming discourse in Belgium

Journal

CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2023.2200016

Keywords

Eco-shaming; eco-shame; green shame; environmental discourse; environmental policy; flight shaming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rise of Greta Thunberg and the flight shame movement in Sweden, along with school strikes for climate, has significantly changed the context for understanding environmental affairs in 2018. This paper introduces the concept of the eco-shaming discourse and demonstrates how it represents a new understanding of the environment as a public good with shared but differentiated responsibilities. The paper compares the eco-shaming discourse with other environmental discourses and examines its implications for environmental politics, using discourse analysis and empirical data from Belgium.
The rise of Greta Thunberg, the Swedish 'flygskam' (flight shame) movement, and school strikes for climate: the context for apprehending environmental affairs changed significantly in 2018, enabling the construction of a new environmental discourse of which practices of eco-shaming and emotions of eco-shame are visible expressions. This paper conceptualizes this 'eco-shaming' discourse by exposing the complex set of constituents underpinning it. It demonstrates how the eco-shaming discourse embodies a conception of the environment as public good and how it relies on the idea of shared but differentiated responsibilities in caring for the environment. As such, the paper adds the eco-shaming discourse as an eleventh environmental discourse to the ones famously identified in The Politics of the Earth. The paper then compares the eco-shaming discourse with other environmental discourses and discusses its implications for environmental politics. The paper draws upon a specific methodological application of discourse analysis that gives emotion a place it usually lacks in environmental discourse analysis. The empirical analysis includes text documents (n = 2155) from three societal domains (media, policy, and advocacy) in Belgium. This paper contributes theoretical and empirical knowledge on eco-shaming, environmental discourses, policymaking, as well as methodological insights on how to acquire such knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available