4.0 Article

The Quest to Cultivate Tolerance Through Education

Journal

STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 231-246

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11217-023-09874-8

Keywords

Tolerance; Democracy and education; Agonism; Citizenship education; Political emotions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the notion of tolerance in education and argues for a pragmatic understanding of tolerance through an agonistic lens. It explores different interpretations of tolerance and interprets Dewey's pragmatism as a theoretical basis for advancing tolerance. The paper suggests that cultivating an embodied sense of tolerance among students requires moving beyond deliberative interpretations.
This paper examines the notion of tolerance in education. In general, tolerance is perceived as a means to resist hostility, raise awareness of cultural differences, mitigate violence, and maintain liberal and democratic values. In education, there are various initiatives, such as the International Day for Tolerance (UNESCO in Declaration of principles on tolerance, 1995), that aim to build resilience against different forms of hate and cultivate openness and acceptance of the other. Yet the idea of tolerance includes different understandings and interpretations. This paper argues that cultivating an embodied sense of tolerance among students, in particular in divisive communities, requires us to move beyond deliberative interpretations of tolerance and to advance a pragmatic understanding of tolerance through an agonistic lens. This paper starts with a review of several dominant interpretations of tolerance. The heart of the paper focuses on interpreting Dewey's pragmatism as a theoretical basis for advancing tolerance. The final part of the paper explores how pragmatism through an agonistic lens can support a more flexible and humane approach to dealing with political conflicts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available