4.2 Article

The prevalence of mental illness in young people in custody over time: a comparison of three surveys in New South Wales

Journal

PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2192257

Keywords

adolescent mental illness; adolescent self-harm; adolescent suicide; childhood trauma; custodial settings; prevalence rates; substance use; trends over time; youth justice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared data from three large surveys of youth in custody in New South Wales conducted in 2003, 2009, and 2015. The findings showed little consistent change over time in rates of mental illness, self-harm and suicidal behaviors, substance use, and childhood trauma, although some fluctuations were observed. Young people in custody exhibited higher levels of these variables compared to the general population. Overall, these data suggest limited improvement in the well-being of young people in custody over time.
Few studies have examined the prevalence of mental illness in young people over time within the same jurisdiction. In the current study, we compared data from three large surveys of youth in custody in New South Wales, conducted in 2003, 2009 and 2015. We examined rates of mental illness, self-harm and suicidal behaviours, substance use and childhood trauma and found little consistent change over time, though some fluctuations were observed regarding certain mental illnesses and substance use. We also descriptively compared findings with observed rates for the general population and found that young people in custody showed higher levels of all examined variables. In sum, these data suggest little improvement in the well-being of young people in custody in New South Wales over time. Better identification and treatment of these issues are vital if young people are to be prevented from becoming enmeshed in the criminal justice system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available