3.8 Article

Radiation protection measures used in Portuguese interventional radiology departments: A national survey

Journal

RADIOGRAPHY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 597-603

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.04.001

Keywords

Radiation protection; Interventional radiology; Education and training; Fluoroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to characterize radiation protection measures used in interventional radiology departments in Portugal. It was found that most equipment for fluoroscopy-guided intervention procedures in Portugal are single-sourced with a flat panel detector, and some of the recommended radiation protection measures need to be updated. Moreover, there is a lack of radiation protection education and training among staff members.
Introduction: This study aimed to characterise radiation protection (RP) measures used in interventional radiology (IR) departments in Portugal with respect to European and national recommendations. Methods: An online national survey was created to characterise the fluoroscopy technology as well as analyse the frequency of body fluoroscopy-guided intervention procedures (FGIP), RP education and training of the staff, and RP measures used daily. Results: In Portugal, most equipment for FGIP are single-sourced and have a flat panel detector (70%). The most commonly FGIP are percutaneous biliary drainage, percutaneous arterial and venous thrombolysis/thrombectomy, arteriovenous malformations embolization, and percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for arteriovenous fistulas. Only a few staff members had received postgraduate education and training in RP (30%), with most nurses having not received RP education and training (40%). Some of the recommended RP measures lacked harmonisation. Additionally, >50% of the IR departments do not consider examination dose values to identify patients eligible for tissue reactions follow-up. Conclusion: This is the first study to examine the characteristics of IR departments in Portugal. We observed a lack of RP education and training among staff members; further, there was a need to update some RP measures in some IR departments according to the recommendations. Implications for practice: Our findings will be presented to the participating IR departments in order to update and promote RP best practices. Moreover, our findings will be presented to the national societies of the different professional groups in order to inform strategies for harmonising RP education and training of the staff. (c) 2023 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available