Journal
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 1899-1933Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3
Keywords
Management; Methodology; Replicability; Research process; Structured literature review; Systematic literature review
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are widely used in management research, but often lack stringent presentation, leading to a lack of replicability. This paper offers an integrative review of SLR guidelines in the management domain, refining the six-step SLR process into 14 distinct decisions. It guides researchers in designing, executing, and publishing impactful SLRs.
Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have become a standard tool in many fields of management research but are often considerably less stringently presented than other pieces of research. The resulting lack of replicability of the research and conclusions has spurred a vital debate on the SLR process, but related guidance is scattered across a number of core references and is overly centered on the design and conduct of the SLR, while failing to guide researchers in crafting and presenting their findings in an impactful way. This paper offers an integrative review of the widely applied and most recent SLR guidelines in the management domain. The paper adopts a well-established six-step SLR process and refines it by sub-dividing the steps into 14 distinct decisions: (1) from the research question, via (2) characteristics of the primary studies, (3) to retrieving a sample of relevant literature, which is then (4) selected and (5) synthesized so that, finally (6), the results can be reported. Guided by these steps and decisions, prior SLR guidelines are critically reviewed, gaps are identified, and a synthesis is offered. This synthesis elaborates mainly on the gaps while pointing the reader toward the available guidelines. The paper thereby avoids reproducing existing guidance but critically enriches it. The 6 steps and 14 decisions provide methodological, theoretical, and practical guidelines along the SLR process, exemplifying them via best-practice examples and revealing their temporal sequence and main interrelations. The paper guides researchers in the process of designing, executing, and publishing a theory-based and impact-oriented SLR.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available