Journal
MANUAL THERAPY
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 83-89Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.01.001
Keywords
Sympathetic nervous system; Lumbar spine; Joint mobilisations
Categories
Funding
- Musculoskeletal Association of Chartered Physiotherapists
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Oscillatory Maitland mobilisations are commonly used in the management of lower back pain with research suggesting that mobilisations at 2 Hz may excite the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) more than sustained pressure glides or 0.5 Hz oscillatory mobilisations. Objectives: Investigate the effects of increasing the oscillation frequency greater than 2 Hz. Design: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, independent group experimental design. Method: Sixty healthy male volunteers were randomly allocated to one of four groups; a control group (no contact), placebo group (sustained static pressure to L4 vertebra), and two intervention groups receiving a centrally applied postero-anterior mobilisation applied at either 2 Hz or 3 Hz for three 1-min periods. SNS activity was recorded by a blinded data collector by continuous skin conductance (SC) activity levels in the feet using a Biopac MP35 electrodermal amplifier. Participants were blinded to their group allocation which was further validated by a post-experiment questionnaire (p > 0.05). Results: The magnitude of sympathoexcitatory response was greatest for the 3 Hz mobilisation (20%) compared with the 2 Hz mobilisation (12%), placebo (-1%) and control conditions (3%). Only the 3 Hz group demonstrated statistical significance when compared to placebo intervention (p = 0.002), and the control group (p = 0.02). Conclusion: SC changes reflect those of previous studies using lumbar mobilisations at 2 Hz, however the 3 Hz group was found to have a greater magnitude of effect worthy of consideration within research and clinical settings. These findings provide preliminary evidence to support the use of 3 Hz oscillatory mobilisations to affect a greater magnitude of SNS activity than those previously reported (0.5, 1.5 and 2 Hz). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available