3.8 Article

Financial development, growth and productivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JES-07-2022-0397

Keywords

Financial development; TFP; Economic growth; Agricultural sector; Panel VAR; C23; O13; Q14

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper emphasizes the heterogeneity of the linkages among financial development, productivity, and growth across income groups. An empirical analysis is conducted with a sample of 130 economies and classified into four subsamples. The findings have practical implications for stakeholders involved in long-term investments, suggesting different priorities for less developed and developed economies.
Purpose In this paper, the heterogeneity of the linkages among financial development, productivity and growth across income groups is emphasized.Design/methodology/approach An empirical analysis is conducted with an illustrative sample of 130 economies over the period 1991-2019 and classified into four subsamples: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), developing, least developed and net food importing developing countries. Forecast error variance decompositions and panel vector auto-regressive estimations are computed, with insightful findings.Findings Higher levels of output stimulate the economic development in the agricultural sector, mainly via the productivity channel and, in the most developed economies, also through access to credit. Differently, in developing and least developed economies, the role of access to credit is marginal. The findings have practical implications for stakeholders involved in the planning of long-run investments. In less developed economies, priorities should be given to investments in technology and innovation, whereas financial markets are more suited to boost the development of the agricultural sector of developed economies.Originality/value The authors conclude on the credit-output-productivity nexus and contribute to the literature in (at least) three ways. First, they assess how credit access, agricultural output and agricultural productivity are jointly determined. Second, they use a novel approach, which departs from most of the case studies based on single-country data. Third, they conclude on potential causality links to conclude on policy implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available