Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Deciding What to Replicate: A Decision Model for Replication Study Selection Under Resource and Knowledge Constraints
Peder Mortvedt Isager et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2023)
Why P values are not measures of evidence
Daniel Lakens
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2022)
Justify Your Alpha: A Primer on Two Practical Approaches
Maximilian Maier et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2022)
The Role ofp-Values in Judging the Strength of Evidence and Realistic Replication Expectations
Eric W. Gibson
STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH (2021)
The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value
Daniel Lakens
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses
Anne M. Scheel et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p-Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its Use
William M. Goodman et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Predictive Inference and Scientific Reproducibility
Dean Billheimer
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Moving Towards the Post p
Robert A. J. Matthews
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Assessing Statistical Results: Magnitude, Precision, and Model Uncertainty
Andrew A. Anderson
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
How Effect Size (Practical Significance) Misleads Clinical Practice: The Case for Switching to Practical Benefit to Assess Applied Research Findings
Stanley Pogrow
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
An Introduction to Second-Generation p-Values
Jeffrey D. Blume et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p-Value Ban
Ronald D. Fricker et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent significance Levels
Mark Andrew Gannon et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Putting the P-Value in its Place
Joachim Krueger et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
The p-Value Requires Context, Not a Threshold
Rebecca A. Betensky
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Treatment Choice With Trial Data: Statistical Decision Theory Should Supplant Hypothesis Testing
Charles F. Manski
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in A Post p < 0.05 Universe
David Trafimow
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
Lee Kennedy-Shaffer
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
David Colquhoun
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Moving to a World Beyond p < 0.05
Ronald L. Wasserstein et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
Error statistical modeling and inference: Where methodology meets ontology
Aris Spanos et al.
SYNTHESE (2015)
Living with P Values Resurrecting a Bayesian Perspective on Frequentist Statistics
Sander Greenland et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
The statistical theories of Fisher and of Neyman and Pearson: A methodological perspective
Willi Hager
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2013)
Setting an Optimal α That Minimizes Errors in Null Hypothesis Significance Tests
Joseph F. Mudge et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood
Tobias Johansson
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY (2011)
Blurring the distinctions between p's and α's in psychological research
R Hubbard
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2004)
Confusion over measures of evidence (p's) versus errors (a's) in classical statistical testing
R Hubbard et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2003)
Data, phenomena, and reliability
J Woodward
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2000)
Share Paper
